<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North West Employment Law, Specialist Employment Solicitors &#187; Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nwelaw.co.uk/category/discrimination/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nwelaw.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:17:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Official- Gay Laws Trump Religious Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.nwelaw.co.uk/discrimination/it%e2%80%99s-official-gay-laws-trump-religious-laws</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwelaw.co.uk/discrimination/it%e2%80%99s-official-gay-laws-trump-religious-laws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenbill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwelaw.co.uk/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well not really but the Court of Appeal (Ladele –v- London Borough of Islington) did decide that for a Council to threaten to dismiss a registrar for refusing on religious grounds to carry out civil partnership services was justified. To put it another way religious discrimination ‘was justified by  the Council’s desire to provide its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well not really but the Court of Appeal (Ladele –v- London Borough of Islington) did decide that for a Council to threaten to dismiss a registrar for refusing on religious grounds to carry out civil partnership services was justified.</p>
<p>To put it another way religious discrimination ‘was justified by  the Council’s desire to provide its services in a non- discriminatory way’.  So discrimination on religious grounds is OK to avoid discrimination against same sex couples. Sounds like that’s gay laws trumping religious laws. Why isn’t it?</p>
<p>Because we need to decide whether the result would be reversed if the situation was reversed.  Consider a gay doctor who refused to treat a patient known for their viscerally anti gay religious views- would that doctor’s employer be justified in threatening dismissal? We will not know for sure until it happens but I think it is a safe bet that following Ladele that an employment  tribunal will decide that the employer has a duty to extend its services to all comers. That means not permitting its staff to make such choices.</p>
<p>And in other news… the government has recently announced that because of a fall in the RPI the maximum compensatory award which an employment  tribunal can make is reduced from £66200 to £65300 with effect from 1st February 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwelaw.co.uk/discrimination/it%e2%80%99s-official-gay-laws-trump-religious-laws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

